The FDa never approved Hydroxycut to begin with, but had to step in after the reported death as well as about 23 reports of liver damage, liver failure, cardiovascular issues, seizures, and jaundice.

Back here in South Africa the same product are readily available, and by googling “hydroxycut” I could probably have it delivered to my doorstep just before lunch tomorrow.

Muscletech seems to be one of the main distributors of this product and clicking on the products section in their US website, you get taken to a website explaining the reason for the recall is that the manufacturer agreed to a voluntary recall of its products is “out of an abundance of caution and because consumer safety is Iovate’s top priority.”

Seems to be no abundance of caution here in South Africa as muscletech’s website will sell hydroxycut by the bucketload.

Let’s see what happens.

Related articles

Reuters

Scienceblogs

Yahoo news

Zimbabwe’s new coalition government has cracked all problems with an absurdly simple solution: It has abruptly switched to foreign currencies, allowing customers to pay for products with U.S. dollars or South African rand or Botswana pula.

The entire economy, almost overnight, has switched to a unique system of multiple foreign currencies.Equally swiftly, hundreds of Zimbabwe’s long-closed shops and groceries have reopened, retail licence fees have been slashed, and the new competition has reduced prices to stable levels.
The dollarization (and rand-ization and pula-ization) of the Zimbabwean economy has finally slain the dragon of hyperinflation, providing the first fragile signs of hope for a devastated country. While the junking of the Zimbabwean dollar was a blow to the ego and power of Zimbabwe’s bloated central bank, the radical move to adopt foreign currencies is still one of the fastest ways to kick-start any economy that is ruined by inflation and money-printing excesses.

Goods are still unaffordable to  many people, of course. The unemployment rate is estimated at 94 per cent, wages are often unpaid, and the vast majority of people are dependent on donated food rations.
Not surprisingly, there is a severe shortage of  foreign money. Shops don’t have enough foreign cash to provide change to customers, so they issue “credit notes” on little bits of paper – or persuade their customers to accept change in candies.

Investors, including Canadians, are watching closely. Toronto-based Caledonia Mining Corp., which suspended production at its Blanket gold mine in Zimbabwe last October, is considering a reopening of the mine within the next few weeks because the new government is promising that producers can export a much higher percentage of their production. The mine could produce up to 40,000 ounces per year.

“We welcome the new government policies, and we’re working to get the necessary approvals,” said a spokesman for the Canadian company. “We remain cautious and skeptical. But it would be a shame to miss this opportunity.”
The first twitches of economic recovery can already be seen on Harare’s streets. In the industrial district, dozens of men and women are waiting at the gates of the factories, having heard that a few people are actually being hired on occasion.
“Before, there wasn’t any hope at all,” says Coffee Musiya, 37, an unemployed man who has joined a crowd of about 50 job-seekers outside the gates of the National Foods factory in Harare. The crowd has been waiting for weeks, and a few have gotten temporary jobs at the factory. “It’s a little bit improved now,” he says. “Maybe four or five people might get a day job.”

Many factories are still operating at less than 10 per cent of capacity, despite the political agreement that led to the coalition government between President Robert Mugabe and his foes last month. The total market capitalization of the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange has dropped by more than 50 per cent in the past month, to less than $1.3-billion (U.S.), and volumes are so low that the exchange is open for only an hour per day. But at least the stock exchange is open now. Until Feb. 19, it had been closed for three months.
As recently as the early 1990s, Zimbabwe was one of Africa’s leading economies. Its decaying infrastructure could be still be revived, especially if the government is able to halt the invasions of the dwindling white-owned commercial farms that have plagued the agricultural sector for the past nine years.
One study has predicted that the country could be self-sufficient in agriculture within a year if the invasions were reversed.

The new government is seeking $5-billion (U.S.) in financing from foreign lenders to forestall another collapse in the economy. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are in the midst of a mission to Zimbabwe – their first since 2006 – to decide whether they might offer financing. Western lenders have been insisting that Zimbabwe must fire the central bank governor, Gideon Gono – the man who printed all those $100-trillion (Zimbabwe) banknotes, and reputedly the personal paymaster to Mr. Mugabe himself.
So far Mr. Gono has managed to keep his job. But the new government has eliminated or reduced a host of taxes and retail licence fees that were previously funnelled to the central bank – including heavy taxes on retail turnover and export revenue.

Government elites had profited from preferential rates on foreign exchange, allowing them to obtain U.S. dollars at rates far below the street value. The dollarization of the economy has wiped out those perks as well. And the new government is working hard to separate Mr. Gono and Mr. Mugabe from their traditional control of the money flow.

“The process of change is irreversible,” said John Robertson, an independent economist in Harare. “The wedge will be driven harder and harder.” All we can do is wait and see if this “solution” is as effective as they claim.Hopefully for Zimbabwe’s sake it is the final solution.

And what happened next?

Watch the video clip.

[See post to watch Flash video]

Susan Boyle, it is a honour to show your video on my blog.

A standard SMS message contains up to 140 bytes (1120 bits) of data – this takes care of the 160 characters allowed in your text message. This might not make sense at first, until you realize that SMS uses 7 – not 8 – bit characters – leaving you with 128 possible character values instead of the normal 256. So 1120bits/7bits = 160 characters.

So our total message length is about a tenth of a kilobyte (.13671875 Kbytes). That gives us 7 messages on a kilobyte. There is 1024 kilobytes on a Megabyte that gives us 7168 messages on a megabyte. Again there is 1024 megabytes in a Gigabyte that gives us 7340032 messages on a gigabyte. Our sms’s will then cost us R4.404.019-00 per Gigabyte.

Let us assume that all these messages get sent in off peak time and halve the sms cost. The cost for our gigabyte of data would then be R2.202.009-00

Let us assume that half of the messages that you sent, you get for free through some scheme or contract. The cost of a sms would then be R1.101.004-00.

Big questions asked:

Why are we being ripped of by the cell phone providers? the argument in favour of the data providers usually alludes to the costs of maintaining the network, but here is the facts:

The marginal cost of a SMS is 0. SMS messages are sent on the control channel. Initially SMS were implemented in the GSM standard as a control system, just like the ICMP protocol of the IP stack. Then NOKIA though to implement a actual instant message function using SMS. The Contol channel is the channel that your mobile listens to in order to receive calls. So for receiving a SMS a control signal is sent. Since bandwidht is somehow limited on these channels it could happen that in a situation of massive usage of texting the control channel gets saturated and normal voice protocol initiation is disrupted. To prevent this carriers nowadays apply a kind of QoS delaying SMSs until there is no risk of congestion. So we can state that the marginal cost is 0 and the cost/opportunity is also 0.

There is a case for opportunity cost, where a provider charges a premium for the opportunity of making our lives easier, and that is true for a sms. I’m surely not advocating that there should not be any premium for the cellphone providers given the nature of the sms, I’m just asking for a fair price. That is all.

Regards

AJ.